GSTAT Cuttack Bench: no further pre deposit can be insisted upon for filing an appeal before the GSTAT under Section 112
no further pre deposit can be insisted upon for filing an appeal before the GSTAT under Section 112
Stay updated
no further pre deposit can be insisted upon for filing an appeal before the GSTAT under Section 112
The Hon’ble Madras High Court pronounced on 08.06.2026 in the case of M/s. Fastenex Private Limited that GST Notices u/s 74 Cannot Fail Solely Because Multiple Financial Years Are Covered.
The Hon’ble Delhi High Court has allowed a writ petition filed by the Petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in the import and trading of precious metals, directing the Customs authorities to immediately process and release consignments of platinum alloy jewellery studded with precious stones.
The assessee, a sugar mill, availed Cenvat credit on capital goods and inputs used for erection of a 24 MW power plant, part of whose electricity was captively consumed in manufacture of dutiable sugar and molasses, and surplus supplied to the State Electricity Board. Department denied credit relying on CBEC
The Honorable Supreme Court passed an Order dated 09.01.2026 in State of Jharkhand & Ors. versus M/s. BLA Infrastructure Private Limited that the refund of pre-deposit be refunded u/s 107(6) read with Section 115 of the Jharkhand GST Act and not u/s 54.
The Minister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary has informed Rajya Sabha that the recommendations of the GST council regarding the rates of Goods and Services Tax are binding on the Centre and the States and that the Supreme Court’…
A writ petition filed challenging the levy of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) on disability equipments was mentioned before the Supreme Court on Friday. The writ petition Nipun Malhotra versus Union of India was filed in 2017. The counsel…
The AAAR, Maharashtra in Dubai Chamber of Commerce and Industry [Order No. MAH/AAAR/AM-RM/08/2022-23 dated June 23, 2022] has modified the order of the AAR, to the extent that, the activities performed by the Liaison Office (“LO”) acting as link for…
The Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), headed by R.S. Syal (Vice President) and Partha Sarathi Chaudhury (Judicial Member), has deleted the penalty on the grounds that the excess claim of deduction was made due to a…
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted the additions on the grounds that the assessee proved the genuineness of the purchases through documentary evidence. The two-member bench of Yogesh Kumar US (Judicial Member) and Pradeep…