Stay updated
The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in M/s Simla Gomti Pan Products Pvt. Ltd. granted interim protection to the Petitioner by directing deposit of Rs. 3.50 crore within two weeks, and ordered that no coercive steps …
The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Amit Mehra v. Union of India [Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.20996/2025, order dated January 12, 2026] held that notwithstanding the gravity of the alleged offence relating to fake input tax credit, the petitioner was entitled to regular bail considering prolonged judicial custody, non-commencement of trial, absence of charge-framing, the offences being triable by a Magistrate, and the maximum punishment being up to five years, and accordingly set aside the order of the Punjab & Haryana High Court declining bail.
The Supreme Court of India on Tuesday expressed concern over what it described as an alarming trend of lawyers using artificial intelligence tools to draft court petitions, after encountering instances in which judgments and quotations cited in pleadings were found to be either non-existent or inaccurate.
Putting to rest the long-running confusion around ‘intermediary’ services under Goods and Service Tax (GST) law..
The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Madras Bar Association held that the provisions of the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 that reintroduced clauses previously struck down by the Court are unconstitutional.
The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of GR Infra Projects Limited Ratlam v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. [Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 33594/2025, order dated November 21, 2025] held that the impugned Show Cause Notice (“SCN”) issued under Section 74 of the GST Act is prima facie bereft of material particulars as it contains only figures without
The Honorable Supreme Court passed an Order dated 09.01.2026 in State of Jharkhand & Ors. versus M/s. BLA Infrastructure Private Limited that the refund of pre-deposit be refunded u/s 107(6) read with Section 115 of the Jharkhand GST Act and not u/s 54.
The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax held that Revenue’s appeal against CESTAT Kolkata’s finding of revenue neutrality in Steel Authority of India Limited’s (“SAIL”) inter-unit transfer of refractory materials was admitted, condoning delay and keeping the question of law open, as the Tribunal had set aside excise duty demands holding the transaction to be revenue-neutral.
The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Shivamma (Dead) by LRs v. Karnataka Housing Board & Ors. held that for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 the expression “within such period” means the entire duration from when the cause of action accrued or limitation commenced until actual filing
The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Customs, Ahmedabad, after condoning the delay and uphold the CESTAT Ahmedabad judgement that the imports of gold and silver bars made by Adani Enterprises Ltd. under the Duty-Free Credit Entitlement (“DFCE”) licenses issued by DGFT were valid, rejecting allegations of fraudulent entitlement and circular trading.