ArticleGST Article

Alternative Remedy before GSTAT to be Exhausted Despite Allegation that Adjudication Travelled Beyond SCN

The Hon’ble High Court at Calcutta in the case of RSH Amit Realty Development LLP &Anr. v. The Deputy Commissioner of Revenue, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge & Ors. [WPA 29673 of 2025 order dated April 27, 2026] held that where the assessee had already availed the appellate remedy under Section 107 of the CGST/WBGST Act and a further statutory remedy before the GST Appellate Tribunal (“GSTAT”) remained available

ArticleGST Article

Incremental GST burden on pre-GST works contracts is recoverable only from the contracting employer and not from the State or tax authorities

The Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in State of Karnataka & Ors. partly allowed the appeal filed by the State of Karnataka and held that reimbursement of incremental GST paid by contractors pursuant to transition from the KVAT regime to the GST regime can be claimed only against the concerned employer under the works contract and not against the State Government or the tax authorities.

ArticleGST Article

Limitation for filing GST appeal runs from the date of actual communication of the order as declared by the dealer unless rebutted by the Revenue through cogent material

The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in Wilh Loesch India Pvt. Ltd. quashed the appellate order dismissing the appeal solely on the ground of limitation, without entering into the merits, and held that once the Assessee discloses the actual date of communication of the adjudication order