Penalty Cannot Be Confirmed Beyond What is Specified in Statutory Form GST DRC-01
The Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in the case of Comfort Battery vs Additional Commissioner Central Goods and…
The Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in the case of Comfort Battery vs Additional Commissioner Central Goods and…
The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Fateh Education Consulting Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner & Ors [W.P.(C)…
The Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in the case of Scorp Industries & Anr. held that where cancellation of GST registration was founded upon a field visit report, such report ought to have been supplied to the taxpayer before rejection of the application for revocation under Section 30 of the CGST/WBGST Act.
The Hon’ble High Court at Calcutta in the case of RSH Amit Realty Development LLP &Anr. v. The Deputy Commissioner of Revenue, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge & Ors. [WPA 29673 of 2025 order dated April 27, 2026] held that where the assessee had already availed the appellate remedy under Section 107 of the CGST/WBGST Act and a further statutory remedy before the GST Appellate Tribunal (“GSTAT”) remained available
The Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in State of Karnataka & Ors. partly allowed the appeal filed by the State of Karnataka and held that reimbursement of incremental GST paid by contractors pursuant to transition from the KVAT regime to the GST regime can be claimed only against the concerned employer under the works contract and not against the State Government or the tax authorities.
The Hon’ble Gauhati High Court in Debabrata Bhowmick set aside the Order-in-Appeal whereby the appeal filed under Section 107 of the CGST Act was rejected as time-barred and held that the period spent in bona fide prosecuting a rectification application
The Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in M/s. Flex Enterprises quashed the orders cancelling the GST registrations of the Petitioners along with the consequential suspension of the registrations,
The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in Wilh Loesch India Pvt. Ltd. quashed the appellate order dismissing the appeal solely on the ground of limitation, without entering into the merits, and held that once the Assessee discloses the actual date of communication of the adjudication order
The Gujarat High Court has quashed a reassessment notice issued by the Income Tax Department in a long-running capital gains dispute,
The Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in The Commissioner of Central Tax & Ors. set aside the order passed by the Learned Single Judge to the extent it issued blanket directions to the Revenue to waive interest, penalty, and the limitation for filing returns/revised returns in respect of delayed returns and payment of tax by a sub-contractor…