Stay updated
The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Kanakia Spaces Realty Private Limited set aside the Order-in-Original confirming a GST demand of Rs. 42.65 crores which was passed on the basis of a Show Cause Notice issued under Section 74 of the CGST Act in the name of a company
The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Tata Sons Private Ltd. held that settlement of a foreign arbitral award and withdrawal/suspension of enforcement proceedings by the award-holder pursuant to such settlement does not amount to a “supply”
Pune-based manufacturer of diesel and natural gas engines Cummins India Ltd on Thursday (July 9) informed exchanges that the Income Tax Department has filed appeals before the Bombay High Court against an Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) order that had granted relief to the company in respect of adjustments amounting to ₹210.77 crore.
The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of D P Jain & Co. Infrastructure Private Limited held that executing a corporate guarantee by a holding company in favour of its subsidiary, without any consideration, is not a “supply” or “supply of service” taxable under Section 9 of the CGST Act, 2017.
The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Rika Global Impex Limited held that benefit under the RoDTEP Scheme cannot be denied to exporters of sugar merely because the export was categorized as ‘restricted’, ..
The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Matrix Cellular (International) Services Pvt. Ltd. held that recovery proceedings cannot be resorted to when the statutory period to file an appeal is still available, as it would render the appellate remedy illusory.
The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Navin Vishwanathan Prop. of M/s. Oriental Facility held that invocation of recovery proceedings under Section 79 of the CGST Act, 2017 against the bank account of a legal heir, without prior adjudication of liability under Section 93 of the CGST Act, 2017 …
The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Taiyo Nippon Sanso India Pvt. Ltd. quashed the rectification order passed under Section 161 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd held that the GST Appellate Tribunal
The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Hindustan Equipment Craft v. Assistant Commissioner of State Tax [Writ Petition No. 1257 of 2026, order dated February 27, 2026] held that assignment of leasehold rights to a third party constitutes transfer of benefits arising out of immovable property and does not qualify as a “supply of services” under the GST regime, thereby not liable to GST.
