Stay updated
The CESTAT in Principal Commissioner v. M/s Hira Ferro Alloys Limited [Excise Appeal No. 53531 of 2018 with Excise Miscellaneous Application No. 50363 of 2019 dated September 6, 2022] held that the assessee is entitled to Central Value Added Tax…
The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in M/s. NITCO LIMITED v C.C.E. & S.T.-DAMAN [Excise Appeal No. 13016 of 2019] has held that the Clearing and Forwarding (“C&F”) agent service is an admissible input service in the terms of Rule 2(l) of the…
The CESTAT, Hyderabad in the matter of M/s. VITP Private Limited v Commissioner of Central Tax, Hyderabad [Final Order No: A/30070-30073/2022 dated July 8, 2022] set aside the demand of service tax on refundable security deposit on the grounds that…
The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in the matter of M/s. CADILA HEALTHCARE LTD v C.C.E. & S.T.-VADODARA-I [Excise Appeal No. 10100 of 2020 dated June 24, 2022] has held that assessee is not liable for payment of either excise duty or cenvat…
The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that expenses incurred by a person on activities related to its Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) cannot be termed as input services and thus, CENVAT Credit cannot…
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) consisting of Sulekha Beevi C.S. (Judicial Member) and P. Anjani Kumar (Technical Member) has held that the credit availed by the Indian Overseas Bank on the Service…
Summary SCN not fulfilling the ingredients of a proper SCN and thus violative of principles of natural justice The Hon’ble High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in M/s. Godavari Commodities Ltd. vs. The State of Jharkhand [W.P.(T) No. 3908 of…