GST DAILY – 454 : No bar on issuing summons by CGST authority even if State GST authority has already passed order: HC
THE HON’BLE DELHI HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF Armour Security India ltd. V/s Commissioner CGST, Delhi East, decided on 7-2-2025
Stay updated
THE HON’BLE DELHI HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF Armour Security India ltd. V/s Commissioner CGST, Delhi East, decided on 7-2-2025
THE HON’BLE DELHI HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF Nand Kishore Gupta V/s Additional Director General, decided on 17-12-2024
The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in Future Consumer Ltd. held that the OIO accompanied by Form GST DRC-07, containing the name , the designation and the ward, and other details of the official will be valid, even if it does not contain the signature of the official passing it.
Source: Business Standard | 24.11.25 The Delhi High Court on Monday granted interim relief to Elon Musk’s Tesla Inc in its trademark…
Mr Goel had to approach the Delhi High Court to get an order directing the income tax department to issue him a tax refund of Rs 6.42 lakh along with Rs 3.55 lakh interest on that refund.
The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of XY v. Union of India & Ors. held that the grant of reward to GST evasion informers is a discretionary matter and informers do not have an enforceable right to seek mandamus or directly challenge adjudicatory orders, as award or reward is not a right, but a privilege granted as per administrative guidelines.
THE HON’BLE DELHI HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF J.M. Plastic Industries V/s Deputy Commissioner of Central Tax GST, decided on 16-12-2024
THE HON’BLE DELHI HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF Kshitij Ghildiyal V/s Director General of GST Intelligence, Delhi, decided on 16-12-2024
THE HON’BLE DELHI HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF Kone Elevator India Pvt. Ltd. V/s Commissioner, Central Tax Delhi West
The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Mohan Footcare Pvt. Ltd. held that the refund of ITC initially adjusted as erroneous refund must be re-credited to the assessee’s Electronic Credit Ledger, and that technical limitations of the GST portal cannot be used to deny statutory rights to re-credit.