Stay updated
GSTAT New Delhi published MOM held on 29.05.2026 and on 01.06.2026 , under the chairmanship of the Hon’ble (Dr.) Justice Sanjay Kumar Mishra, President, GSTAT. This was conducted for Resolution of Representation received from various Trade/Bar Associations.
Considering the difficulties being faced by the appellants in the initial phase for filing of appeals on the GSTAT Portal, the President is pleased to direct that, the Registry shall keep a lenient view during scrutiny of the appeal documents for an initial period of 6 months..
The GST Appellate Tribunal Delhi in the case of DGAP held that the respondent cinema’s reliance on state-fixed ticket caps does not absolve it of liability for not passing on GST rate reduction benefits to consumers, reaffirming that maintenance charges are also part of the taxable value. Profiteered sums and limited interest were directed to be deposited as per law.
The GST Appellate Tribunal Delhi in the case of DGAP held that the respondent, a hotel service provider, profiteered by not passing the benefit of GST rate reduction on hotel accommodation service and that inflationary pricing due to COVID-19 and …
The GSTAT Delhi in the case of DGAP held that once a resolution plan is approved by the NCLT under the IBC, 2016, all claims and dues not included in the resolution plan stand extinguished, and consequently, the Resolution Applicant cannot be held liable for unquantified ITC benefits not passed on by the previous entity under Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. The anti-profiteering proceedings against Puma Realtors Pvt Ltd were therefore closed.
The GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) Delhi in DGAP , held that the provision for imposition of 18% interest on the anti-profiteering amount under Rule 133(3)(c) of the CGST Rules applies prospectively only to cases arising after June 28, 2019, and is not applicable retrospectively to profiteering occurring between July and October 2018; thus, while the profiteered amount of Rs. 6,88,770/- was confirmed, no interest or penalty was imposed.
Goods & Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), issued an Order dated 24.09.2025 regarding filing of Appeal before GSTAT in a staggered manner
GSTAT in DGAP vs. Raj & Co., order dated August 18, 2025 held that the Respondent was guilty of not passing on the benefit of GST rate reduction on cosmetics products to the ultimate consumers and directed deposit of Rs. 3.31 Lakhs along with 18% interest into the Consumer Welfare Fund under Section 171 of the CGST Act.