Stay updated
The Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court in the case of Leighton India Contractors Private Limited vs Union of India & Ors held that a company registered in one State which fails to comply with GST provisions, including filing of returns, would be treated as a defaulter and can be denied registration in another State, as the GST framework is both State-centric and Central-centric.
THE HON’BLE RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF Akshansh Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. V/s Deputy Commissioner D. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2957 of 2024, decided on 1-4-2025
THE HON’BLE RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF Goverdhandham Estate Pvt. Ltd. v/s State of Rajasthan D.B, decided on 17-1-2024
The Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court in the case of IDP Education India Pvt. Ltd. held that services rendered by the Petitioner to IDP Australia under a bi-partite agreement, without any contractual relationship with students, do not qualify as intermediary services under Section 2(13) of the IGST Act. Consequently, these services qualify as “export of services” and the Petitioner is entitled to IGST refund.
The Rajasthan High Court on Wednesday directed India’s direct tax authority to extend the deadline for filing tax audit reports and related income tax returns for the 2025–26 assessment year by a month.
The Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court in the case of Shree Arihant Oil and General Mills held that Circular No. 181 dated November 10, 2022, which restricts refund claims on ITC for applications filed after July 18, 2022, for goods under inverted duty structure such as mustard oil, is illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution, and inconsistent with Notification No. 09/2022-Central Tax (Rate) and Section 54 of the CGST Act, 2017.
The Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court in the case of Acme Cleantech Solutions Pvt. Ltd. issued notice and stayed a show cause notice issued by Additional Director, DGGI, while examining the constitutional validity of Notification No. 14/2017-CT and Circular No. 3/3/2017 …
The Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court in Tej Jain held that the observations on ITC in para 6.8 of the Order passed by AAAR were to be expunged given the fact that the question pertaining to ITC was not originally dealt with by AAR and hence the AAAR had travelled beyond the grounds of challenge in the appeal.
The Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court in Consultancy Services (P.) Ltd. dismissed a writ petition in limine where an appeal was filed against the assessment orders which were admittedly beyond period of limitation prescribed under the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (“the CGST Act”).
Audit can be conducted even after cancellation of registration if tax liability subsists: HC