The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax Ludhiana has disposed the appeal filed by Revenue challenging earlier order passed in favour of the Respondent by the CESTAT, which had set aside the demand for service tax w.r.t revenue sharing agreement between Exhibitor and Distributor pertaining to showcasing of films/ movies.
The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in the case of Vishal Tansukhbahai Gohel that in the case of outbound shipment, both by aircraft and vessel, the destination of goods shall be outside India. Therefore, there will be no Service tax on the freight margin recovered by the Appellant from the customer.
The CESTAT, Chandigarh in the case of M/s. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. partly allowed the appeal filed by setting aside the penalty and confirming the demand of tax, thereby holding that, Service Tax is payable under reverse charge when reimbursable expense incurred by distributor on providing service on behalf of the taxable person for business purpose under Business Auxiliary Services.
In a recent ruling, the Mumbai Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that BookMyShow, an online ticketing platform, is not liable to pay service tax on transactions with card companies.
The Supreme Court in a recent order upheld the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruling and held that Ramdev’s Patanjali Yogpeeth Trust is liable to pay Rs 4.5 crore to tax authorities for charging an entry fee for organising Yoga camps.
In a setback to the Patanjali Yogpeeth Trust, the Supreme Court on Friday upheld an appellate tribunal’s ruling that the organisation is liable to pay service tax for charging an entry fee for organising Yoga camps, both residential and non-residential.
Roads and buildings officials in Vikarabad district approached Telangana High Court challenging the orders of GST commissionerate, which had directed Axis Bank and State Bank of India to freeze bank accounts belonging to the district R&B department and to enable the GST wing deduct Rs. 78.12 lakh from the accounts.
The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of C.C.E. & S.T. Surat v. Arkay Logistics Ltd. dismissed the Civil Appeal filed by the Revenue Department thereby holding that, primary service of transportation of goods along with ancillary service of handling of goods and related activities would not be taxed as Cargo Handling Service.
The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in the case of M/s. Inox India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise [Service Tax Appeal No.…
The Hon’ble CESTAT, Bangalore, in the case of Naveen Chava v. Commissioner of Central Tax [Service Tax Appeal No. 20013…
