The facts before the HC were that the petitioner transferred its intellectual property rights (IPRs) and goodwill through a Business Transfer Agreement (BTA). The BTA constituted a slump sale of the petitioner’s entire domestic formulation business for a lump sum consideration.
**Key Points from the HC Ruling**
1. It is held that the BTA did not amount to a sale of goods within the purview of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax (MVAT) Act.
2. A transaction where the entire business is transferred “lock, stock, and barrel” constitutes a “transfer of business” and is not liable to VAT.
3. The AO cannot artificially separate IPRs and goodwill from the business transfer for taxation purposes.
4. Item 39 of Schedule C (tax on goods of intangible or incorporeal nature) does not apply to the BTA.
The significance of this ruling reaffirms that a slump sale of a business as a going concern cannot be subject to VAT by artificially dissecting the whole transaction and levying tax on individual assets or rights transferred as part of the business.
‼️ As far as I am aware, authorities have been raising GST demands on the portion of business sales or slump sales to the extent the consideration can be attributed to the non-competing clause of the BTA. This ruling will be a helpful reference in those cases.
Share this content: