GST DAILY – 30 : Authorized signatory on the portal

10/09/202304/01/2026byCA Pradeep Modi

Post Views: 144

Unable to add the authorized signatory on the portal and getting the error as “Duplicate mobile numbers are Passed in partner/promoter details” while filing the application.

Advertisements

Suggested solution

You are informed that as per GST Functionality, the mobile No and email ID for Every Partner/promoter or Authorized Signatory should be unique.
The warning message “Duplicate mobile numbers are Passed in partner/promoter details” will be displayed by GST Portal if e Mail ID and Mobile Number are common between Partner/Promoter/Authorized Signatory.
This warning will not come if same person is registering in more than one capacity.

For e.g. if same person registers as Partner and Authorized Signatory, the GST System will not give this warning message.

Share this content:

ITC can’t be denied if disclosed in GSTR-9 but missed in GSTR-3B due to inadvertent error

The Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in the case of Laxmi Ghosh held that the Appellate Authority failed to provide reasons for rejecting the Petitioner’s claim to set off IGST Input Tax Credit declared in the annual return GSTR-9 against the tax demand when the same was inadvertently missed in the monthly returns GSTR-3B, and set aside the Appellate Authority’s order for non-consideration of the ITC claimed in GSTR-9 and inadequate reasoning, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication.

Gaming laptops are “Automatic data Processing Machines” and not “Video Game Console”

The CESTAT, Chennai in M/s. Asus India Private Limited v. Commissioner of Customs held that, gaming laptops are classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading 8471 as “Automatic data processing machines” even though it is being marketed as a gaming computer that is capable of running high end graphic intensive games.

HC directs Government to complete the selection process of members within four months for initiating GSTAT operations

The Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of CA. P.J. Johney directed the Government to appoint members within four months for initiating GSTAT operations. However, the Court denied the Assessee’ s request to amend Section 169 of the CGST Act making service of notices and orders through at least three modes of service mandatory, stating that such issues were subject to individual litigation and therefore, cannot be adjudicated upon by way of PIL.

Related Posts

Leave a Reply Cancel reply