GST Daily – 93 HC upheld the constitutional validity of Section 16(4) of CGST Act

byCA Pradeep Modi
Post Views: 840

THE Hon’ble PATNA HIGH COURT in the case of GOBINDA CONSTRUCTION V/s UNION OF INDIA ,decided on 8-9-2023

Advertisements

👉 Issue

✔️ Is Section 16 (4) of CGST Act is constitutionally valid and not violative of Articles 19(1)(g) and Article 300-A of Constitution of India?

👉 Hon’ble High Court Judgement

✔️ Section 16(4) of the CGSTAct are constitutionally valid and are not violative of Articles 19(1)(g) and Article 300-A of the Constitution of India. The said provision is not inconsistent with or in derogation of any of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India.

👉 Note:- 

Recently in the case of THIRUMALAKONDA PLYWOODS ANDHRA PRADESH High Court have already delivered same type of judgement

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Share this content:

Related Posts

Failure to declare amount in return alone does not imply wilful suppression

The CESTAT, Chandigarh in M/s. M R Beltings v. Commissioner of Central Excise Rohtak set aside the demand order on the ground that the entire demand is barred by limitation since, the department was not able to bring anything on record to show that the assessee has suppressed the material fact in order to evade the payment of duty.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Credit of unadjusted TDS under VAT can be transitioned into GST regime

Whether the Petitioner is entitled to migrate and transition the TDS amount as ‘a credit of the amount of VAT’ in GST regime in its ECL? Jharkhand High Court held that the assessee is entitled for migration of the TDS amount in terms of Section 140(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *