๐๐จ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง ๐๐๐ ๐๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ง๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ฒ ๐๐ญ๐จ๐๐ค ๐๐ซ๐๐ง๐ฌ๐๐๐ซ๐ฌ: ๐๐๐ ๐.๐ ๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ฎ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง
With GST 2.0, the compensation cess on motor vehicles has been discontinued, raising a key concern: the accumulated cess paid on vehicles lying in OEM stockyards becomes an unrecoverable cost since it is no longer refundable or creditable.
Why was the cess paid initially? Transfers from OEM factories to their own stockyards are treated as โdeemed suppliesโ under GST law.
Cess was always meant to be a levy on actual consumer transactions or genuine commercial dealings not on internal stock transfers within the same entity.
It is important to note that stock lying within OEM premises does not attract any compensation cess as it is internal inventory. Similarly, the inventory lying at stockyards is also OEM-owned and essentially part of the same inventory pool. ๐๐ก๐๐ซ๐๐๐จ๐ซ๐, ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐๐ฆ๐ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐๐ข๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ฒ.
Furthermore, once the cess is discontinued, any cess paid on stock lying at stockyards by default becomes excess cess paid under section 34 and stands refundable.
Technically, Section 8 of the Compensation Cess Act mandates cess on supplies effected under CGST Act.
A sound interpretation could be that Section 8 of the Compensation Cess Act ๐๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ง๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐๐ฅ ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ข๐๐๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง, ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐๐๐๐ฆ๐๐ ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ญ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ฌ๐ข๐๐๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ฅ๐ข๐ค๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐-๐๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐จ๐๐ค ๐ฆ๐จ๐ฏ๐๐ฆ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ. Notably, deeming provisions have a limited scope and should not be stretched beyond their intended purpose.
This aligns with the principle that taxation should focus on real economic transactions and consumption.
This issue deserves thoughtful attention as GST 2.0 reshapes the tax landscape. Clarity here will translate into lower prices and direct benefits for consumers
Book: Historical Rates Reform in GST 2.0
Share this content:
