By Vikash Agarwal
In an important decision, Honβble CESTAT Delhi has held that the Supreme Courtβs judgment on π¬πππ¨π§ππ¦ππ§π π¨π ππ¦π©π₯π¨π²πππ¬ ππ¨ππ¬ π§π¨π ππ©π©π₯π² where secondees are deputed by a π
π¨π«ππ’π π§ ππππ ππππ’ππ ππ¨ π’ππ¬ ππ§ππ’ππ§ ππ«π¨π£πππ ππππ’ππ.
The Tribunal observed that a ππ π’π¬ π§π¨π π π¬ππ©ππ«πππ π₯ππ ππ₯ ππ§ππ’ππ² ππ«π¨π¦ π’ππ¬ ππ. Sending staff from HO to PO is therefore βservice to selfβ, not manpower supply.
Following the SCβs ruling, the DGGI had initiated investigations on expat secondments, including those involving Project Offices.
This decision gives clear judicial support to Project Offices, confirming that such arrangements are not taxable as manpower supply and providing an important reference point in ongoing investigations and disputes on expat secondments.
Share this content:
