ArticleGST Article

Cross-Empowerment under Section 6 of the CGST Act is Automatic and Intelligence-Based Enforcement is valid regardless of Taxpayer Assignment

The Hon’ble High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh in the case of in R.K. Ispat Ltd. held that cross-empowerment under Section 6 of the CGST Act is automatic and does not require a separate government notification unless conditions are imposed; intelligence-based enforcement actions can be initiated by either Central or State authorities regardless of taxpayer assignment; the Joint Commissioner is competent to issue show cause notices even when amounts involved are below Rs. 1 crore; and bunching of show cause notices across multiple assessment years under Section 74 is not expressly prohibited.

GST ArticleHigh Court

Budgetary Support Scheme is not hit by Doctrine of Promissory Estopple and Legitimate Expectations

The Hon’ble Jammu and Kashmir High Court in the case of Sudhir Power Ltd. dismissed the writ petition challenging the government order replacing the Budgetary Support Scheme (“BSS”) providing for reimbursement of Integrated Goods and Services Tax (“IGST”) with Turnover Incentive Scheme, 2021 (“Turnover Incentive Scheme”). Both the schemes were for the benefit of the taxpayers, hence, cannot be said to be “irrational, unreasonable or arbitrary. Therefore, they are not hit by any of the Doctrines i.e. promissory estoppel and legitimate expectation. However, BSS will shall be reviewed by the Finance Department at the end of every financial year to find out its viability with reference to its continuance in the next financial year.