GST DAILY – 381 : Assessee was allowed to resubmit the annual return as the alleged mistake occurred in initial phase of GST: HC
What types of remedies available if annual return as the alleged mistake occurred in initial phase of GST?
What types of remedies available if annual return as the alleged mistake occurred in initial phase of GST?
On Tuesday, October 7, the Kerala High Court asked the Customs Department to explain why they seized actor Dulquer Salmaan’s Land Rover.
THE HON’BLE KERALA HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF Velayudhan Gold LLP V/s Intelligence Officer, Intelligence Unit, Kottarakara, decided on 24-7-2024
THE KERALA HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF Tirupati Balaji Traders V/s Union of India , decided on 24-7-2024
In a significant development, the Kerala High Court has released a first-of-its-kind policy regulating the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools by the state’s district judiciary. The policy firmly prohibits AI usage for judicial decision-making or legal reasoning, aiming to ensure responsible and ethical deployment of such technologies.
The Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of Mathai M.V. held that a confiscation order passed under Section 130 of the CGST Act without valid service of notice on the vehicle owner in the prescribed statutory modes is void and non-est in law.
The Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of Winter Wood Designers & Contractors India (P.) Ltd held that non-invocation of powers of rectification was not proper, where there was duplication of orders based on two proceedings initiated alleging same irregularities, there was an error apparent on record. Therefore, authority ought to have invoked powers of rectification under Section 161 of the CGST Act, as error was brought to its notice within statutory period.
The Kerala High Court has struck down the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, which allowed the levy of GST on supply by clubs and associations to their members.
The Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of RejimonPadickapparambil Alex allowed the appeal filed against the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Single Judge Bench thereby holding that the availment of ITC under wrong head is a technical mistake and would not fall within the purview of wrong availment of ITC, therefore, the initiation of proceedings for levy of interest and penalty under Section 73 of the CGST Act cannot be initiated in the said case.
Synopsis: Orders issued under Section 73 of the CGST/SGST Acts must carry the digital or manual signature of the officer…