Stay updated
The author would like share his inference drawn on Case: Neeyamo Enterprise Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. CTO (Madurai), Madras High Court (Madurai Bench) – Order dated 11.11.2025 (W.P.(MD) Nos. 30453 to 30458 of 2024). This represents Section 74 of CGST Act dealing with non-payment/ short payment due to fraud, willful misstatement, suppression.
THE HON’BLE MADRAS HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF Carbolase Technologies V/s Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Tuticorin, decided on 21-2-2025
THE HON’BLE MADRAS HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF Avian International V/s Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Tuticorin
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in Sudhan VFX quashed the final demand and intimation notice raised under Form GST DRC-01D by the adjudicating authorities under Section 79 of the TNGST Act.
THE HON’BLE MADRAS HIGH COURT IN THE CASEOF Fairmacs ShipstoresPvt. Ltd. V/s Deputy Commissioner (ST)
THE HON’BLE MADRAS HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF T.B. Sabrish V/s Assistant Commissioner (ST), decided on 20-12-2024
THE HON’BLE MADRAS HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF D.G. Construction V/s Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, decided on 14-8-2024
THE HON’BLE MADRAS HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF T.S.R. Trading Company V/s Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, decided on 30-10-2024
THE HON’BLE MADRAS HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF SRI Vari Industrial Works V/s Commissioner-Appellate Authority (ST)
Order set aside as it was uploaded on portal but not served by registered post, preventing the assessee from participating in proceedings: HC