GST DAILY – 460 : Matter to be remanded as levy of Interest and penalty unjustified where unutilized ITC was reversed: HC
THE HON’BLE MADRAS HIGH COURT IN THE CASEOF Fairmacs ShipstoresPvt. Ltd. V/s Deputy Commissioner (ST)
Tag: Madras HC
GST DAILY – 447 : Order to be set aside as SCN & order were only uploaded on GST portal and not served through any other means: HC
THE HON’BLE MADRAS HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF T.B. Sabrish V/s Assistant Commissioner (ST), decided on 20-12-2024
GST DAILY – 439 : Attachment of bank account was lifted as assessee was unaware due to accountant’s failure to access portal: HC
THE HON’BLE MADRAS HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF D.G. Construction V/s Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, decided on 14-8-2024
GST DAILY – 423 : ITC cannot be claimed if the supplier issued invoices without actual receipt of goods: HC
THE HON’BLE MADRAS HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF T.S.R. Trading Company V/s Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, decided on 30-10-2024
GST DAILY – 420 : GST registration to be restored as assessee could not file returns due to health conditions: HC
THE HON’BLE MADRAS HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF SRI Vari Industrial Works V/s Commissioner-Appellate Authority (ST)
GST DAILY – 399 : Order set aside as it was uploaded on portal but not served by registered post, preventing the assessee from participating in proceedings: HC
Order set aside as it was uploaded on portal but not served by registered post, preventing the assessee from participating in proceedings: HC
GST DAILY – 398 : GST registration shall stand revived upon payment of tax, penalty and uploading of pending returns: HC
Jamal Mohamed Jahir Hussain V/s Superintendent of CGST and Central Excise, decided on 8-11-2024
Kalaignar TV moves Madras High Court against income tax proceedings related to 2G spectrum case
The 18-year-old alleged 2G spectrum scam has come back to haunt Kalaignar TV Private Limited, with the Income Tax (I-T)…
Rectification application filed to be mandatorily disposed within six months of issuance of order or notice or any other document under Section 161
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Manu Blue Metals and M. Sand disposed of the writ petition in case where the rectification application filed was not being decided upon within the prescribed period of six months for rectification of order as per Section 161 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act (“the CGST Act”).
Issuance of consolidated GST SCN/ order for multiple financial years is impermissible, and must be quashed
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Instakart Services Private Limited held that the issuance of a consolidated show cause notice and passing a single order covering multiple financial years is impermissible in law.