ArticleGST ArticleHigh Court

Assessment and recovery proceedings could not be sustained without consideration of factual and legal issues

The Hon’ble Himachal Pradesh High Court in Hindustan Construction Company Limited held that the matter required reconsideration on factual and legal aspects and remitted it to the Assistant Commissioner, State Taxes and Excise, Dharamshala, directing a fresh decision by September 30, 2025, after affording opportunity of hearing.

ArticleGST Article

Mere reliance on the reply of the driver of the vehicle in order to process confiscation and imposition of fine & penalty contrary to Section 130 of the CGST Act

The Hon’ble Uttarakhand High Court in the case of M/s Gajanand Granite held that the confiscation proceedings initiated and concluded on the same day without affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and merely relying on the statement of the driver of the vehicle are in violation of the mandate prescribed in Section 130 (4) of the CGST Act.

ArticleGST Article

HC directs Department to consider matter afresh where reply filed by the Taxpayer through email has not been considered and opportunity of personal hearing not granted

The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of M/s Shree Balaji Enterprises held that rectification under GST can only be sought for an apparent error on the face of record and not for reassessment, however, the matter has been remanded for fresh adjudication due to violation of principles natural justice.

ArticleGST Article

Order Passed without issuance of Proper Show Cause Notice and without giving an opportunity of being heard is liable to be Quashed

The Hon’ble Gauhati High Court in the case of Ganapati Enterprise set aside the Impugned Order and the summary of SCN on the ground that the Impugned order was passed without issuance of a proper SCN under Section 73(1) of the CGST Act and without affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the Petitioner.