Stay updated
The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the case of Clear Secured Services Private Limited held that maximum penalty of Rs.10,000/- could be imposed by the Revenue Department, when no amount of tax has been evaded by the Assessee and there is only delay in depositing the amount of tax collected by the Supplier.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of M/s. Deepak Sales Corporation v. Union of India [CWP No.…
The CESTAT Bangalore, in the case of Mr. Rafeek K.T. v. Commissioner of Customs, Cochin [Customs Appeal No. 20074 of…
Shares of Vedanta opened 0.5 percent higher during early trade on November 20, after the Anil Agarwal-led company received a GST demand order…
UltraTech Cement has received an order from the Assistant Commissioner, CGST & C. Ex Division 3, Bhavnagar raising demand for…
The Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of M/s. Global Plasto Wares v. Assistant State Tax Officer [WP (C)…
The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in M/s. Om Prakash Kuldeep Kumar v. Additional Commissioner Grade-2 and Another [WRIT TAX No.…
The Hon’ble Kolkata High Court in the case of M/s. Ishaan Plastics Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. V/s The Deputy Commissioner…
The shares of Godrej Properties traded down marginally in early trade on October 16 after the company’s arm received GST…
The Hon’ble Madras High Court allowed the writ petition and held that the penalty could not be imposed on wrongly availed ITC as there is no change in tax liability of the Assessee when Transitional Credit has been debited for discharging tax liability and wrongly availed Input Tax Credit has been reversed.