Stay updated
The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax, Navi Mumbai disposed of the case and held that the Court did not find any good ground and reason to interfere with the CESTAT Judgment, where it was held that no service tax should be charged on reimbursement of expenses because no service element is involved.
The state govt will soon finalise guidelines for GST reimbursement to handloom weavers, said handloom and textiles minister S Savitha.
The CESTAT, Chennai, in M/s ABC Consultants Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Service Tax set aside the demand of service tax on reimbursed amount and held that the assessee only paying advertisement charges on behalf of clients which was later reimbursed to him on actual basis thus the demand of service tax is unsustainable.
Whether reimbursements are treated as additional consideration and are liable to GST?
The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that reimbursable expenses are not includible in the taxable value of the service in terms of Rule 5(1) of the Service Tax (Determination of Value)…
The ITAT, Mumbai in the matter of Techknowledgy Interactive Partners P. Ltd. v. ITO [ITA No. 350/MUM/2009 dated January 9, 2023] has held that no tax is required to be deducted at source on amount reimbursed to the director of…
The Hon’ble Chhattisgarh High Court in M/s Gordhandas Gobindram v. State of Chhattisgarh [WPC No. 5471 of 2022 dated December 20, 2022] allowed the petition filed by the assessee to seek reimbursement of the additional tax liability on implementation of…