Stay updated
HC held that it is duty of the owners/dealers to substantiate why the goods during transportation did not accompanied by the documents as specified under GST law
The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in Bhawani Traders Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh held that if the assessee comes forward and is willing to pay the penalty for the detained goods, the Revenue Department cannot issue penalty order under section 129(1)(b) of the CGST Act.
The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in M/s.Margo Brush India & Ors. v. State of U.P set aside the penalty order passed under Section 129(1)(b) of the UPGST Act by the adjudicating authority and held that penalty u/s 129(1)(b) of the UPGST Act was unjustified and untenable…
The Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in Ravi Trading Co. v. Deputy Commissioner of State Tax directed the Revenue Authority to release goods on conditions that the assessee deposits a certain amount of penalty towards tax in lieu of confiscation of conveyance and furnish bank guarantee in lieu of confiscation of goods.
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the matter of Deepam Roadways v. the Deputy State Tax Officer and Ors. [W.P.…
The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in Ram Prakash Chauhan v. Commissioner of Delhi (Goods and Service Tax) & Anr. [W.P.(C)…
The Agrofood Chamber of Commerce and Industry has requested Minister for Commercial Taxes P Moorthy to withdraw the recent amendments…