Stay updated
No, the Honorable Himachal Pradesh High Court in the case of M/s. Microtek Himachal Power Products (P.) Ltd. v. State of Himachal Pradesh [CWP No. 5562 of 2023 dated June 26, 2024] disposed the writ petition and directed that the erroneous order passed with the wrong description be treated as Show Cause Notice and be further adjudicated upon after the filing of reply to the deemed SCN.
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of M/s S.R.S. Construction set aside the orders which have been signed by the same officer in dual capacity, holding that such orders are liable to be set aside.
Suzlon Energy Limited has been penalized ₹4,158 by the Office of the Commissioner of Indirect Taxes & Customs, Hyderabad, for short reversal of input tax credit under Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017, the company informed stock exchanges on Wednesday.
Writ petition to be dismissed as misconceived with liberty to assessee to challenge order before Appellate Authority: HC
Intelligence Wing Officer can issue pre-show cause notice to reduce litigations
The Allahabad High Court observed that if the proceedings under Section 73 of the CSGT Act have been finalised, they cannot be reopened except when the Input Tax Credit has wrongly been availed or utilised due to fraud or any wilful mis-statement or suppression of facts to evade tax.
The Honorable Court noted that earlier this court had directed the respondents to conduct the proceedings at one place alone. Since the proceedings have already been initiated by the State Authorities, there is no occasion to uphold the action of the DGGI or the action of the state authorities to transfer proceedings to DGGI, Meerut pending before it.
HC directs assessee to approach IT dept. for release of cash seized by GST Dept. as it was handed over to them
The 54th GST Council meeting has recommended rectification processes related to the ITC for demands under section 73, 74, 107 and 108 of the CGST Act, 2017.
The Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of Vishal Chauhan granted bail to the Assessee, where the Assessee was arrested for wrongful availment of ITC by showing purchases from non-existent or fraudulent suppliers, was granted regular bail as trial was likely to be prolonged, the SCN under Section 74(1) was yet to be adjudicated, and Assessee had no prior criminal record, and there was no risk of flying away, as the Assessee was willing to surrender his passport.