Unused ITC, inverted duty structure under review as govt explores GST relief

In an inter-ministerial review chaired by Cabinet Secretary TV Somanathan ahead of the September 22 rollout of GST reforms, officials discussed ways to deal with sectoral concerns over compensation cess, unused input tax credit (ITC), and the inverted duty structure, Business Standard has reported.

Advertisements

According to the report, proposals on the table included permitting unutilised ITC to be applied toward state GST (SGST), offsetting Customs duty, or converting the credit into tradable scrips. These ideas were floated as potential relief mechanisms for industries grappling with blocked tax credits and working-capital strain.

The discussions come in the backdrop of several sectors highlighting that, after the recent GST rate rationalisation, many finished goods such as FMCG products, food, and medicines now face a 5 per cent levy, while key inputs, including services, continue to attract 18 per cent GST. This mismatch, Business Standard noted, has intensified the inverted duty structure and left large portions of ITC stranded, hitting liquidity and operational flexibility—particularly for smaller manufacturers.

“Inverted duty structure was one of the primary issues flagged by ministries,” an official told Business Standard on condition of anonymity. The meeting was attended by top representatives from the finance, textiles, agriculture, consumer affairs, commerce, heavy industries, chemicals and fertilisers, and steel ministries, among others.

While the government currently permits refunds of up to 90 per cent of input-related GST under inverted structures, experts cited by Business Standard pointed out that no such relief applies to GST paid on capital goods and input services. “This makes it essential for policymakers to step in, so that the benefits of lower tax rates can actually flow to consumers,” one tax expert said.

Another tax specialist told Business Standard that states may resist proposals to use ITC against SGST, citing revenue risks, and added that current law prohibits cross-adjustment between CGST and SGST. “Unutilised ITC carries both components, and GST circulars do not allow refunds where the credit build-up arises only because of a rate cut. Similarly, Customs duty—levied under a different statute—cannot be set off with GST credits,” the expert explained. Tradable scrips, however, were seen as a potentially viable option, though requiring GST Council clearance.

As explained in the Business Standard report, tradable scrips function like certificates that businesses can either use for tax payments or sell to other firms, thereby creating liquidity. But a former official warned that tax authorities would be wary of misuse unless such instruments were digitally generated and traded securely on the GSTN platform—something that would require significant IT upgrades.

Industry advisors told Business Standard that expanding refund eligibility to include capital goods and input services could ease the credit blockage. Abhishek Jain, partner and indirect tax head at KPMG, said such a step should be taken cautiously with safeguards to prevent abuse.

Similarly, Krishan Arora, partner at Grant Thornton Bharat, emphasised the urgent need to avoid inverted duty structures, particularly in sectors where GST rates have recently dropped to 5 per cent from 12 or 18 per cent. “Transitional relief through transparent refund mechanisms and correction of raw material rates, where inputs remain taxed at 18 per cent while final goods are at 5 per cent, should be prioritised,” he told Business Standard.

Source: moneycontrol

Share this content:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *