‘erroneous refund’ even if the issue had different interpretations by Hon’ble SC and HC
The Hon’ble CESTAT upheld that SCN issued by the department for the recovery of an ***erroneous refund***. This decision came even after the matter was ultimately held in favour of the revenue by the Hon’ble SC, despite the taxpayer having received a favourable ruling from the HC.
CESTAT clarified that since the issue had been conclusively determined by the Hon’ble SC, setting aside the judgement of the HC, it could not be argued that there was no case of erroneous refund on the date the SCN was issued.
Additionally, the Hon’ble CESTAT emphasized that the principles of Section 14 of the Limitation Act apply to appeal filed by taxpayers before the Commissioner (Appeals) under the Customs Act. Section 14 allows for the exclusion of time during which the taxpayer diligently pursued a remedy before an authority that lacked jurisdiction or for similar reasons.
Share this content:
Post Comment