Excise duty payable on closing stock adjusted with input credit and balance paid by cash is considered as actual payment and allowed as deduction u/s 43B of Income Tax Act

The Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in Principal Commissioner of Income Tax – 1, Kolkata v.  M/s. Beekay Steel Industries Limited, [No.- ITAT/177/2021 IA No.GA/1/2021 and IA NO.GA/2/2021] has held that when the assessee adjusted excise duty payable on closing stock of finished goods with available input credit and paid the remaining amount after the said adjustment, would tantamount to actual payment and no disallowance could be made under section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“the IT Act”).

Advertisements

Facts:

M/s. Beekay Steel Industries Limited (“the Respondent”) received a Show Cause Notice (“SCN”) issued by the Revenue Department (“the Appellant”). The Respondent replied to the said notice. However, the Appellant vide Order dated July 17, 2017, rejected the claim of the Respondent, on the ground that the excise duty liability cannot be allowed as a deduction since it was not paid by the Respondent during the relevant year.

Subsequently, the Respondent challenged the “Order” passed by the Appellant by filing an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“ITAT”), wherein, relief was granted to the Respondent and allowed the balance amount of excise duty paid after adjustment with the available input credit in the respective division and that would be tantamount to actual payment of excise duty under Section 43B of the IT Act.

Aggrieved by the ITAT Order, the Appellant has filed this appeal.

Issue:

Whether payment of excise duty after adjusting the same with Input Tax Credit (“ITC”) of excise duty would tantamount as actual payment and no disallowance could be made under section 43B of the IT Act?      

Held:

The Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in Appeal No.- ITAT/177/2021 IA No.GA/1/2021 and IA NO.GA/2/2021, held as under:

  • Held as actual payment and no disallowance could be made under section 43B of the IT Act and Noted that, one of the units of the Respondent was engaged only in job work activity and therefore, not entitled for benefit of input credit and after taking note of the sum paid on the said account and the balance amount was adjusted with the available input credit in the respective division, which undoubtedly would tantamount to actual payment of excise duty.
  • Affirmed the order passed by the ITAT.

(Author can be reached at info@a2ztaxcorp.com)

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.


3 days GST Course by CA Bimal Jain

Topic: Scrutiny Notices, Assessment, Audit, Inspection, Search, Seizure and Arrest under GST

Key features of course:
 E-Certificate to all participants
 Background Material (BGM) available in PDF (Downloadable basis)
 Watch Recording of Course for 27 Hours or 3 Months, whichever expires earlier
 Dedicated WhatsApp group, Telegram and E-mail for Free Subscription of GST Updates for One Year
 Question & Answer after Live session
 Hindi/English medium

GST Course Fees: Rs.2,999/-

  • When inspection, search and seizure can be initiated
  • Offences – Bailable & Non Bailable
  • Various Penalty & Imprisonment provisions
  • Legal Jurisprudence on Search and Seizure
  • Constitutional validity of Search & Seizure by both CGST & SGST Authorities
  • Inspection of goods in movement and penalty proceedings u/s 129 & 130 with recent changes in Union Budget 2021
  • Legal Jurisprudence of Coercive actions by the Dept during Search & Seizure and collection of tax revenue
  • Constitutional validity of arrest provisions before adjudication
  • Legal Jurisprudence of Arrest Provisions
  • Legal validity of Recovery Proceedings in GST
  • Provisional attachment of Property or Bank Account – When Why and Recourse available
  • Power to summon persons to give evidence and produce documents
  • Access to business premises
  • Officers to assist proper officers
  • Validity of Multiple or Parallel Proceedings
  • Various Assessment under GST viz. Self-Assessment, Provisional Assessment, Summary Assessment
  • Scrutiny of Returns, Assessment of Non-Filers of Returns
  • Audit by GST Department and Special Audit under GST Laws
  • Preparation and Handling of GST Audit
  • Procedure during department audit
  • Proceedings of Demand and Recovery
  • Certain Offenses and Penalties

Share this content:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *