HC slams Customs for blocking re-test, orders fresh check of seized cashews
The Bombay High Court last week came down heavily on Customs officials for blocking a facility that the court said was clearly meant to help businesses.
Stay updated
The Bombay High Court last week came down heavily on Customs officials for blocking a facility that the court said was clearly meant to help businesses.
The Bombay High Court’s Goa bench has ruled that Goods and Services Tax (GST) is not applicable on construction services under a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) once the developer becomes the property owner through conveyance.
THE HON’BLE BOMBAY HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF Elitecon International Ltd. V/s Union of India Writ Petition No. 4934 of 2024, decided on 5-9-2024
THE BOMBAY HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF Aberdare Technologies Pvt. Ltd. V/s Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs W.P. No. 7912 of 2024, decided on 29-7-2024
The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in Vilas Prabhakar Lad held that GST authorities must delete the Aadhaar and PAN linked to the Petitioner’s name from the portal as the registration was fraudulently obtained and expressed deep displeasure at the systemic failure across statutory authorities to act upon clear evidence of impersonation and fraud.
Bombay High Court has urged the GST Council and the GST Network (GSTN) to provide for a regular mechanism for transfer of unutilised Input Tax Credit (ITC) from the electronic credit ledger of a transferor Company to a transferee Company located in another state after merger or amalgamation.
Hon’ble Bombay High Court (Goa Bench) in M/s. Umicore Autocat India Pvt Ltd ruled in favour of the petitioner allowing the transfer of untilised input tax credit of a Transferor company in one state to Transferee in another state.
The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of M/s. Galaxy International held that notice under Section 79(1)(c) of the CGST Act ought to be issued to the Petitioner instead of the Bank in so far as the Petitioner must be allowed an opportunity of proving to the satisfaction of the proper officer that no amount was due and payable by the Petitioner to a person in default.
The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of M/s. Reliance Securities Ltd. set aside the Order-in-Appeal on the ground that the alleged delay of four days was reasonable on account of late communication of the Order and noted that the appeal could be filed within an extended time period under Section 107(4) of the CGST Act.
The Hon’ble High Court of Bombay in the case of Tokheim India (P.) Ltd. wherein the Assessee had challenged the adjudication on the ground that GST was not leviable on the assignment of leasehold rights and buildings to a third party.