The Hon’ble Gauhati High Court in the case of Rajesh Mittal vs Union of India [WP(C) No. 371 of 2024 dated January 25, 2024] relying upon the provision of sub-clause (b) of sub-section (2) of Section 6 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the CGST Act”) stayed the proceeding initiated by the Revenue Department, thereby holding that, Central GST Authority should not have issued the SCN when State GST Authorities have already issued SCN on the same issue
Facts:
The Revenue Department (“the Respondent”) served a Show Cause Notice dated December 01, 2023 issued by the State GST Authorities and December 27, 2023 issued by Central GST Authority, (“the SCN”) to Rajesh Mittal (“the Petitioner”), stating that the Petitioner had wrongly availed the input tax credit (“ITC”) thereby violating the provisions of Section 16 (4) of the CGST Act for which reply was filed by the Petitioner.
Held:
The Hon’ble Gauhati High Court in the case of WP(C) No. 371 of 2024dated January 25, 2024 relying upon the provision of sub-clause (b) of sub-section (2) of Section 6 of the CGST Act, stayed the proceedings initiated by the Respondent on the ground that, Central GST Authority should not have issued the SCN when State GST Authorities have already issued SCN on the same issue.
Relevant Provisions:
Section 6 (2)(b) of CGST Act
“Section 6(2)(b): Authorisation of officers of State tax or Union territory tax as proper officer in certain circumstances
(2) Subject to the conditions specified in the notification issued under sub-section (1),
(b) Where a proper officer under the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act has initiated any proceedings on a subject matter, no proceedings shall be initiated by the proper officer under this Act on the same subject matter.”
(Author can be reached at info@a2ztaxcorp.com)
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.
Share this content: