The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Tvl. Deepa Traders v. The Deputy Commissioner (ST), GST-Appeal and Others [W.P. No. 19277 of 2024 dated August 13, 2024] allowed the writ petition and thereby condoned the delay of 285 days in filing of appeal in case where the Order passed, though uploaded on GST Portal, but was not served physically.
Facts:
Deepa Traders (“the Petitioner”) filed a writ petition challenging the Order of demand dated February 08, 2023 and the appellate order dated April 25, 2024 (“the Impugned Orders”) rejecting the appeal filed by the Petitioner on the ground that there was delay of 285 days, in filing of appeal.
Issue:
Whether the delay of 285 days Is condonable for filing of appeal based on the ground that no hard copy of the order was provided to the taxpayer?
Held:
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of W.P. No. 19277 of 2024 held as under:
- Opined that, considering the fact that the notices were uploaded in the portal, but no hard copy was served on the Petitioner, thus, the reasonable cause has been shown by the petitioner for the delay.
- Held that, the Writ Petition is allowed and delay in filing of appeal is condoned.
Our Comments:
However, the Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of M/s. New Grace Automech Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissiner Hosur [W.P.No.35115 of 2022 dated January 3, 2023], wherein similar issues were involved, took a contrary view and observed that “A careful perusal of language in which Section 169 is couched makes it clear that methods of service adumbrated therein are not conjunctive but are alternate methods of service. The reason is, the language in which sub-section (1) is couched makes it clear that service shall be by one of the methods adumbrated therein. To be noted as many as six methods (a) to (f) have been adumbrated therein.”
CLICK HERE FOR OFFICIAL JUDGMENT COPY
(Author can be reached at info@a2ztaxcorp.com)
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.
Share this content: