Opportunity of a personal hearing is required to be provided even when the Assessee did not check the GST portal after the cancellation of the GST registration

The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Chettiar Stores v. Deputy State Tax Officer [W.P. No. 6319 of 2024 dated March 13, 2024] quashed the disputed order wherein the Assessee’s GST registration was canceled and did not check the GST portal because Assessee was not acquainted with GST Portal. The Assessee was allowed to reply to the Show Cause Notice and an opportunity of personal hearing was granted.

Facts:

Chettiar Stores (“the Petitioner”) was a registered person engaged in the business of retail and wholesale trading of wheat, rye flour, corn flour and other cereals.

The Petitioner’s GST registration was cancelled with effect from April 01, 2020. Consequently, the Petitioner asserted that she was not accessing the GST portal. Pursuant to the Show Cause Notice dated July 06, 2023 (“the SCN”), an Order was passed on August 22, 2023 (“the Impugned Order”).

The Petitioner contended that they did not have access to the GST portal and were, in any event, not acquainted with the use of computer resources. The proceedings were not preceded by a notice in GST FORM ASMT-10. Thereafter, the Petitioner agreed to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for re-consideration.

However, the Deputy State Tax Officer (“the Respondent”) pointed out that the Petitioner was provided multiple opportunities and that this is evident in examining the Impugned Order. He also submitted that the Petitioner received multiple notices after the cancellation of the GST registration and that it is not tenable to contend that the Petitioner did not have access to the GST portal.

Hence, aggrieved by the circumstances, the Petitioner filed the present writ petition before the Hon’ble Court.

Issue:

Whether opportunity of a personal hearing is required to be provided even when the Assessee did not check the GST portal after the cancellation of the GST registration?

Held:

The Hon’ble Madras High Court in W.P. No. 6319 of 2024 held as under:

• Directed that, subject to the receipt of the Petitioner’s reply and upon being satisfied that 10% of the disputed tax demand was received, the Respondent was directed to provide a reasonable opportunity to the Petitioner, including a personal hearing, and thereafter issue a fresh assessment order within a period of two months
• Held that, the Petitioner should be provided an opportunity to contest the tax demand. Solely for this reason, the Impugned Order was quashed subject to the condition that the Petitioner remits 10% of the disputed tax demand within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Petitioner was also permitted to submit a reply to the SCN within the aforementioned period. Hence, the writ was disposed of.

Our Comments:

Section 29 of the CGST Act talks about “Cancellation or suspension of registration”. According to Section 29(2) of the CGST Act, the proper officer may cancel the registration of a person from such date, including any retrospective date, as he may deem fit, where:

1. a registered person has contravened such provisions of the Act or the Rules made thereunder as may be prescribed; or
2. a person paying tax under Section 10 has not furnished, or
3. any registered person, other than a person specified in clause (b), has not furnished returns for, or
4. any person who has taken voluntary registration under sub-section (3) of Section 25 has not commenced business within six months from the date of registration; or
5. registration has been obtained by means of fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts.

However, the proviso to Section 29(2) of the CGST Act, the proper officer shall not cancel the registration without giving the person an opportunity of being heard.

Similarly, in the case of the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of SohilbhaiSddiqbhaiAadmani v. Superintendent, Central Goods and Service Tax [R/Special Civil Application No. 2409 of 2023 dated July 28, 2023] wherein an opportunity of being heard in person was also not given to the petitioner. Therefore, show cause notice and order cancelling registration were to be set aside and respondent authority was to be directed to restore the registration of the petitioner.

It is recommended to regularly keep a check on the GST Portal. As per the GST FAQs, the Assessee can login to the GST Portal even after suo moto cancellation of registration.

Therefore, an opportunity of being heard is necessary before cancellation but the Assessee should also regularly check the GST Portal.

CLICK HERE FOR OFFICIAL JUDGMENT COPY

(Author can be reached at info@a2ztaxcorp.com)

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.